Rohit Gupta v. Haryana Urban Development Authority & ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 10564 of 2016 Date of Decision: February 07 , 2020.
Rohit Gupta ...... PETITIONER (s)
Versus
Haryana Urban Development Authority and others ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present:
None for the petitioner.
Mr. Kamal Kumar Yogi, Advocate for respondent No.1.
*****
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ***** LISA GILL, J.
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last two occasions. Today again, none appears on his behalf. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter any longer. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed in default. ( LISA GILL ) February 07 , 2020.
JUDGE 'om'
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No OMKAR SINGH 2020.02.11 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh