Ashok Kumar v. Sonia
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-M-67 of 2006 Date of Order: 24.12.2015 Ashok Kumar ..Appellant
Versus
Sonia ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL
Present:
None for the appellant.
Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.
Rajive Bhalla (Oral) Counsel for the respondent states, on instructions, that the appeal has been rendered infructuous as parties have been granted a decree of divorce by mutual consent and permanent alimony assessed has also been paid.
Counsel for the appellant is not present.
We have heard counsel for the respondent and as we do not find any reason to doubt the correctness of the statement, dismiss the appeal as infructuous with liberty to seek revival, in case there is any error in the statement made by counsel for the respondent. [ RAJIVE BHALLA ] JUDGE 24.12.2015 [ REKHA MITTAL ] nt JUDGE NARESH KUMAR 2016.01.05 14:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh