Greater Mohali Area Development Authority v. Gurdial Singh And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.2530 of 2019 (O&M) with Cross-Objection No.120 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.02.2026 GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA), THROUGH ITS CHIEFADMINISTRATOR ......Appellant Vs GURDIAL SINGH AND OTHERS

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

Present:

Mr. Vinod Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. V.G. Jauhar, Advocate for the appellant(s)/GMADA. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate and Mr. Nitish Kaushal, Advocate for the cross-objector(s)/landowner(s)/respondent(s). **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) CM No.8977-CI of 2019 in Cross-Objection NO.120 of 2019 Prayer made in the application is for impleading the applicant(s) as legal representative(s) of cross-objector/respondent No.2, who died on 02.06.2015. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed, subject to all just exceptions and the applicant(s) as mentioned in paragraph No.3 of the application are ordered to be impleaded as legal representative(s) of crossobjector/respondent No.2 (deceased) in order to pursue the present case. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. Registry to do the needful.

Main case(s) For detailed order, see order of even date passed in RFA No.3096 of 2017 (O&M) with Cross-Objection No.116-CI of 2017 (O&M) titled 'Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) through its Estate Officer Vs. Arminderjit Kaur and Anr."

(HARKESH MANUJA) February 18, 2026 JUDGE Vishal Sethi Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHMED ATIK 2026.02.25 15:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document