Sukhpal Singh v. State Of Punjab



 



 
    
  



  



    


 

!"

"#$%$ & '

' 


  

    
   

  
  ( ) '

*
  * *  

     

 !     

 "

 #      * * 

+ '

,- ./ $

%  !      
!  &'( 

 )  !        *+, $-.

-- $- -/-$  
!  $0 -- -0 -( 1$ 20 ,3
!

   !
  %  3  !4    

-

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 23.12.2021 which is about 11⁄2 years and eight prosecution witnesses have already been examined. 5)   ! 

)   6&/  )  6 !   !  !))! 7    !   
!  '.  ,3
! 6      ! He further submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedents and is not involved in any other case and therefore may be considered for the grant of regular bail. DINESH 2023.07.05 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document



 



 
  3.

On the other hand,  "

  #    has submitted that it is correct that the petitioner is in custody for about 11⁄2 years and eight prosecution witnesses have already been examined and the alleged recovery in the present case was 40 kgs of poppy husk which does not fall in the category of commercial quantity under the NDPS Act. 5)   !    !     ! !       

  

!8! !    !

4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5.

The petitioner has already faced incarceration for about 11⁄2 years and eight prosecution witnesses have already been examined. The alleged recovery does not fall under the commercial quantity. The petitioner is stated to be not involved in any other case except one case under the Prisons Act.  7 

  )     the concession of regular bail to the petitioner, therefore the present petition is allowed. %       ! 

  9  !      93  ! !  

56  



    

8     ) !    )  !      

 , * * /   0.1

+      

:

 ;9, :  ;9, DINESH 2023.07.05 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document