Lal Chand v. Union Of India And ORS.

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 20616 of 2011 Date of decision: 19.1.2015 Lal Chand

...Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and others

...Respondents

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present: Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Anjali Kukkar, Advocate for the respondents.

*** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents, while relying upon para 2 of the written statement, submits that since during the pendency of the writ petition, relief sought by the petitioner has already been granted, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of, as such.

Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner could not deny the correctness of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents.

In view of the above respective stands taken by learned counsel for the parties, present writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

19.1.2015 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) AK Sharma JUDGE AMIT KUMAR 2015.01.20 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document