Pankaj Bansal v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-26411 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision : August 29, 2019 Pankaj Bansal ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab ....Respondent Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Mr. Sherry K. Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Harbir Sandhu, AAG, Punjab, for the State Mr. Rajinder Kumar Singla, Advocate, for the complainant Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) Learned State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Kulwinder Singh, PS Women, Bathinda, submits that offence under Sections 406 and 323 IPC has since been deleted and further the petitioner has since joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigations and nothing is to be recovered from him and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute. In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated - is made absolute till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2019.09.16 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Criminal Misc. No. M-26411 of 2019 (O&M) -2- (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The petitioner shall abide by the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. With these observations, the present petition stands disposed off.

( Fateh Deep Singh ) August 29, 2019 Judge 'tiwana'

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No Whether Reportable ?

Yes/No DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2019.09.16 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.