Karan Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others










 

 


























  














  






 
 !
  !
 "#
$
 %
& #
 
 


"
#$%%&
!'



#
  
"
(#  #
) &
&
*

& #
 
$
' ()*+
+

# $,#
#
 
  &
#%%,

# -

#
!
!!
./0
12$
3+4
-#(*
#
% 5

#
  

3 5$
% 
-
6 !
(*
#
 !3
7'%
8 55 


9 
 

&
 %*

#
 
  
-

%!

:/0



 
;
!
:&

-


%%*
5 !
#
#
 

#
  
- $%!
(
 

!
 

*
 5
0//

#
%'
2 
!


$!3

<;
That on completion of 16 years, 06 months and 07 days actual sentence and 20 years, 04 months and 18 days total sentence as on 30.09.2022, the case of premature release of the petitioner was placed before the State Level Committee in its meeting held on 23.03.2023. After receiving the recommendations from the State Level Committee, Govt. passed the order dated 06.04.2023 that his case will be re- considered after two years from 30.09.2022, if otherwise found eligible. Copy of the Govt. order dated 06.04.2023) is already annexed as Annexure P-1 with the writ petition.

AJAY KUMAR 2024.08.22 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

  

















































8. That it is submitted that in case Life Convict Laxman Naskar vs State of West Bengal & Anr. decided on 1 September, 2000, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has issued certain guidelines as to the basis on which a convict can be released prematurely, they are as under: -

1. Whether the offence is an individual act of crime without affecting the society at large.

2. Whether there is any fruitful purpose of confining of this convict anymore.

3. Whether there is any chance of future reoccurrence of committing crime.

4. Whether the convict has lost his potentiality in committing crime.

5. Socio Economic condition of the convicts family. In the present case, the petitioner is not a law abiding person, is a habitual offender and remained repeatedly involved in 8 criminal offences. The petitioner has also violated the jail rules by absconding from parole on two different occasions for a period of 28 days. Hence, the case of the petitioner is not covered under the above guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case of the petitioner, the State Level Committee recommended to defer his case for two years from 30.09.2022 and Govt. passed order dated 06.04.2023 that the case of the petitioner will be reconsidered after two years from 30.09.2022, if otherwise found eligible." 0

#
 !


*
#
%5 
% !&
# &

5!5$



!
$ 
#

7'%
8 55 
 !&

 

!
#
 

#
  

'

-

#
( '


!
!
#
 

! 

#%%
(
! 
( 
0/++/.
.

, -.

/0



!

,%*


'& #
 +











 
6*3+
=##
> ,? !


 ?



=##
 (%



 ?
AJAY KUMAR 2024.08.22 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh