← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/11833/2015disposed of

Jyoti Sood v. Panjab University And ORS.

2025-07-31Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal2 pages

102/3 cases

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 11833 of 2015(O&M) CWP No. 11991 of 2015(O&M) CWP No. 12025 of 2015(O&M) Dr. Jyoti Sood ....Petitioner vs.

Panjab University, Chandigarh and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. A.P.S.Shergill, Advocate and Ms. Shagun Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner in all the petitions Mr. Subhash Ahuja, Advocate for respondent-Panjab University in CWP- 11833 of 2015 and CWP- 11991 of 2015 Mr. Arun K. Bakshi, Advocate for respondent No. 1 in CWP- 12025 of 2015 Mr. A.S.Rawaley, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 8 in CWP-11991 of 2015 Mr. Suvir Sidhu, Advocate Mr. Satinderpal Singh, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 6 in CWP- 12025 of 2015 Mr. D.S.Patwalia, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sehar Navjeet Singh, Advocate for respondents No. 7 to 9 in CWP- 12025 of 2015 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

By this common order, CWP No. 11833 of 2015, CWP No. 11991 of 2015 and CWP No. 12025 of 2015 are hereby adjudicated as common questions of law and facts are involved. PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.07.31 05:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No. 11833 of 2015 -2and connected cases 2.

The petitioner through instant petitions under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to permit her to continue to work as Assistant Professor.

3.

The petitioner in the original petition made multiple prayers, however, during the course of hearing has confined her prayer to permit her to continue in view of her uninterrupted more than a decade service. 4.

The respondent has filed additional affidavit wherein conceded that petitioner is working as Assistant Professor in UIET. She is teaching Physics. There are six posts of Assistant Professors (Physics) in UIET. One post is lying vacant. The petitioner is working against vacant post of Assistant Professor.

5.

Considering the factual position and keeping in mind order of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Hargurpratap Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others, (2007) 13 SCC 2, this Court finds it appropriate to direct the respondent-University to permit the petitioner to continue to work as Assistant Professor till regular Assistant Professor (Physics) is appointed in UIET.

6.

Petitions stand disposed of in above terms.

7.

Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 31.07.2025 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.07.31 05:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document