Mohit Alias Bander v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRWP-5133-2025 (O&M) Decided on :19.05.2026 MOHIT ALIAS BANDER

...Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA PRESENT: None for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1.

The present criminal writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as "BNSS, 2023"), and Sections 3(1)(c) and 3(1)(d) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 (as amended up to date), seeking release on parole for a period of eight weeks to enable him to look after his agricultural land and to take care of his old-aged mother.

2.

At the very outset, learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has already been extended the benefit of suspension of sentence vide order dated 21.01.2026 passed in CRM-50497-2024 in CRA-D-3432024 and, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. 3.

Today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that after the release of the petitioner, he is no longer interested in pursuing the present criminal writ petition.

RIYA 2026.05.21 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-5133-2025 (O&M) 4.

Accordingly, in view of the statement made by learned State counsel, as recorded hereinabove, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

5.

Pending criminal miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE ( DEEPAK MANCHANDA ) JUDGE 19.05.2026 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RIYA 2026.05.21 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document