Jagdish Singh Pundir v. Union Of India & ORS

CWP-10939-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-10939-2016 Date of Decision: February 05, 2018 Jagdish Singh Pundir

...Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

Present:

Ms. Smriti Singla, Advocate, for Mr. Aalok Jagga, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. V.K. Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No. 1.

Mr. IPS Doabia, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

Mr. Rajdeep S. Cheema, Advocate, for respondent No. 4.

ARUN PALLI, J. (ORAL) Concededly, the petitioner retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.05.2015. It is not disputed either, he had prayed for extension in service for two years, i.e. upto the age of 60 years. And since he attained the age of 60 years on 31.05.2017, i.e. almost a year ago, nothing substantive survives in this petition and the same is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE February 05, 2018 Pkapoor Whether Speaking/Reasoned:

YES / NO Whether Reportable:

YES / NO Prashant Kapoor 2018.02.06 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document