Raunak Singh v. State Of Punjab
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28969-2023 Date of decision: 22.07.2024 RAUNAK SINGH ..........Petitioner versus STATE OF PUNJAB .......Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH
Present:
Mr. Arjunveer Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vinay Kumar, DAG, Punjab.
*** KIRTI SINGH, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in case FIR No.49 dated 02.05.2023, under Section 306 of IPC, registered at Police Station Shimlapuri, District Ludhiana.
2.
Learned State counsel on instructions from the ASI Rajinder Kumar of Police Station Shimlapuri submits that in compliance of order dated 02.06.2023, the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for any further investigation. Learned State counsel has filed status report dated 20.07.2024 in Court today, which is taken on record. 3.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petition is allowed. Order dated 02.06.2023 passed by this Court, is hereby made absolute.
4.
This order should not be treated as "blanket" order. It will not be read granting the petitioner(s) indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any other incident that involves commission of an offence. KAVITA NAIN 2024.07.23 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment
CRM-M-28969-2023 -25.
This order does not in any manner limit or restrict the rights or duties of the police or investigating agency to investigate into the charges against the petitioner(s).
6.
The petitioner(s) shall be deemed to be in custody for the purpose of Section 27 of the Evidence Act in regard to a discovery of facts made in pursuance of information supplied by the petitioner(s) in case the occasion arises.
7.
It will be open to the police or the investigating agency to move to this Court for a direction under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. to arrest the accused, in the event of violation of any term, such as absconding, non-cooperating during investigation, evasion, intimidation or inducement to witnesses with a view to influence outcome of the investigation or trial. (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE 22.07.2024 Kavita Nain Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No KAVITA NAIN 2024.07.23 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment