K.K. Sharma v. State Of Punjab & ORS

-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11949-2015 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.08.2023 Dr. K.K. Sharma

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA  










 
  !!!!!

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA , J. (Oral)

 

"

 



# 

 $

%

 





  

& 

'








 
(



)$ $* +**, +

-
 






 & 

'
 

 


 '' '

$.

$* +*$/
 "

 &

  




0 
1
2$+3


 

 2 '

3
0 
$4.*






 '

0 +


 


5&66

' 



'
7 "
 



-2-

'

-
 



 '

  

 








" +**/&*,





 


 

 "
 



'
-
 
 







0 +
2 3


  
0 
5 &66

 '


'
 
 


 







  



"


8

'

*/
" 
 
 
-
 

#



  

 





 



  

'
 

%

 '

 
 &


 

$.

$* +*$/



 
)$ $* +**,





 


'
 


'

*/
"




 

  &




'
$,
"

9 

 



"
+**,


+*$/




 
 &
 
'



 '

 '
 





'' '
 $.

$* +*$/

7 



%





"
  





0 




            



 


+*$*
2.3

-0
.*4





 '

"


'
 
 

      

 

!"





# $  %&



 ' 
+*$/
2$)3

:::

)

   

 


& 

-3-  '



'




'
"

;6 

 

7 "





  

*:

*, +**1


''
"

;6

 '
 
 



<
 





"



 

 

  

#
' 







  

 




'
-
 
   '


'








 ;6


'





'



 


 &


 
<

  



 

'
  /

6



 ' ,

9'

"


'





 
'
 


 
 

 "




''


;6




" '"
 




''

' 

  









 






 
'
7 "

 





0 +
2 3


 



5 &66


& =(b) The Government further reserve to themselves the right of withholding or withdrawing a pension or any part of it, whether permanently or for a specified period and the right of ordering the recovery from a pension of the whole or part of any pecuniary loss caused to Government, if, in a departmental or judicial proceeding, the pensioner is found guilty of grave misconduct or negligence during the period of his service, including

-4service rendered upon re-employment after retirement: Provided that-

(1) Such departmental proceedings, if instituted while the officer was in service, whether before his retirement or during his re-employment, shall after the final retirement of the officer, be deemed to be a proceeding under this article and shall be continued and concluded by the authority by which it was commenced in the same manner as if the officer had continued in service;

(2) Such departmental proceedings, if not instituted while the officer was in service whether before his retirement or during his re-employment- (i) shall not be instituted save with the sanction of the Government;

(ii) shall not be in respect of any event which took place more than four years before such institution; and (iii) shall be conducted by such authority and in such place as the Government may direct and in accordance with the procedure applicable to departmental proceedings in which an order of dismissal from service could be made in relation to the officer during his service.

(3) No such judicial proceedings, if not instituted while the officer was in service, whether before his retirement or during his re-employment shall be instituted in respect of a cause of action which arose or an event which took place more than four years before such institution"

x x x x x :

9'

 



0 




 
7 "



 






 '


 



'
%


 '  

 
 


"





 
8


*/
"
'



 


 &

-5- 






7 "

 



 
'

*/
"
8

'



 
'
 
'
7 "

<

"

 


 


"
 
 




 

8 .

6
      

 

!
2 3
 #
 

#'

 '


% 
 

 


& =2. The Respondent filed the Writ Petition in the High Court seeking quashing of the said charge sheet on the ground that it was barred in view of Rule 2.2.(B) of the Punjab Civil Service Rules 2 reserves right with the Government to withhold or withdraw a pension or a part of it under certain circumstances viz. when in judicial proceedings or departmental proceedings, such an employee is found to have committed grave misconduct or negligence. It also provides for recovery of peculiar loss, if caused. However, second proviso to the aforesaid provision stipulates the time limit within which the departmental inquiry can be instituted, in respect of an ex-employee if it was not stated while such a Government officer was in service. The precise language of second proviso is as follows:- "Such departmental proceedings, if not instituted while the officer was in service whether before his retirement or during his re-employment:- (i) shall not be instituted save with the sanction of the Government;

(ii) shall not be in respect of any event which took place more than four years before such institution; and if he has retired, the event should not be more than 4 years old.

iii) shall be conducted by such authority and in such place as the Government may direct and in accordance with the procedure applicable to departmental proceedings in which an order of dismissal from service could be made in relation to the officer during his service.

-63. In the present case since the changes were of the year 2002 and charge sheet served in the year 2008, it was manifest that the alleged event took place much more than 4 years before the serving of charge sheet and after his retirement. In this ground the learned Single Judge quashed the said chargesheet dated 7.1.2008. The petitioners chose to file appeal before the Division Bench which has also been dismissed by the Division Bench vide impugned judgment dated 20.8.2009.

4. After hearing the Counsel for the parties we are of the opinion that in view of aforesaid admitted facts, second proviso of Rule 2 states at the face of the petitioner and no fault can be found in the judgment of the High Court."

<
% 
 






'


 0 $****>&




 

 '

 ;



#'
"

% 
 
%

 


 


7 


 

6

 ?

2 3

 
#'
 '

 

& =

                                         

          !

  "#

$##%&            

   '

    $#"$##(     )       *$+$$*+   

  '

  

 

,      -       

          !.  

   

      

-7-  

 

  /  

     '0    

        ('    "#

$##%         '

 % $##!

  0   /  *  +*&.
'+    

  

  % $##!2 $*

@

 




 





 


'

 




7 

 ;6

 &

 

 



  
#'




0 
<
 
 
"

0 +
2 3


 


5&66
  


 


 "



 
 "


<

 










 


 $$

<
@


 $+

A
 13.

Pending CM(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. $* *1 +*+)









(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA)

3 ()'* @
8 >
 B
A @
0 
 B A