Mohinder Sharma v. Haryana Urban Development Authority & ANR

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH CWP- 11018- 2016 Dat e of deci si on: - 30. 05. 2016 Mohi nder Shar ma . . . Pet i t i oner Ver sus Har yana Ur ban Devel opment Aut hor i t y, Panchkul a and anot her .

. . . Respondent s CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI Pr esent : - Mr . Deepak Sonak, Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner .

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, A. C. J. ( ORAL) Ther e i s no war r ant f or i nt er f er i ng wi t h t he show cause not i ce dat ed 15. 01. 2015. The pet i t i oner was bound t o pay t he escal at ed amount under t he l et t er of al l ot ment .

The pet i t i oner ' s def ence i s t hat a cl ai m was r ai sed i n t he year 2002 whi ch was r epl i ed t o by hi m and t hat t her eaf t er no act i on was t aken. The ef f ect of t he conduct of t he par t i es woul d r equi r e t o be consi der ed i n t he pr oceedi ngs pur suant t o t he show cause not i ce. The f act i s t hat t he amount s have not been pai d. Whet her t he non- payment was j ust i f i ed or not i s an i ssue whi ch ought t o be deci ded i n t he pr oceedi ngs. 2.

The wr i t pet i t i on i s, t her ef or e, di smi ssed.

Needl ess t o add t hat al l t he cont ent i ons of t he par t i es wi l l be deci ded i n t he pr oceedi ngs.

( S. J. VAZI FDAR) ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE ( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE

30. 05. 2016 Amodh AMODH SHARMA 2016.05.30 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh