← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/26540/2019dismissed

Manjit Singh v. State Of Punjab

2019-08-29Mr. Justice Surinder Gupta2 pages

CRM-M-26540 of 2019 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26540 of 2019 Date of Decision: 29.08.2019 Manjit Singh ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rakeshinder Singh Sidhu, A.A.G. Punjab.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.72 dated 25.04.2019 registered for offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Kamboj, Amritsar Rural, District Amritsar.

Heard.

As per allegations in the FIR, the petitioner had taken money from complainant as well as several other persons to arrange employment for them or for their wards in the Army.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though allegations of payment have been levelled against the petitioner but details of the same are missing and petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Shashpal Singh JITENDER KUMAR 2019.08.30 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-26540 of 2019 -2submits that the police has so far recorded statements of 59 persons, who have deposed about making payment to petitioner, who assured employment of their wards in the Army. They have given details about place, where the payments were made and names of witnesses in whose presence those payments were made.

In view of submission of learned State counsel and taking note of gravity of offence, I am of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required in this case. The relief of anticipatory bail is a discretionary relief and no case is made out to exercise the discretionary power of this Court to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to petitioner at this stage.

Dismissed.

August 29, 2019 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JITENDER KUMAR 2019.08.30 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh