Ram Kumar v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 12027 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.02.2025 Ram Kumar ....Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. P.S.Jammu, Advocate and Mr. R.K.Poonia, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G. Haryana Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to release his retiral dues.

2.

Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate submits that on account of lack of petitioner's consent to treat his suspension period as leave of the kind due, the retiral benefits could not be released.

3.

Mr. P.S.Jammu, Advocate submits that petitioner is present in Court and he has instructions to say that period of suspension may not be treated as duty period and may be treated as leave of the kind due. PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.02.20 00:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No. 12027 of 2015 (O&M) -24.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondents to release petitioner's retiral dues within one month from today.

5.

Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 20.02.2025 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.02.20 00:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document