Rajesh Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 218 Civil Writ Petition No.12065 of 2015 Date of Decision: September 08, 2015 Rajesh Kumar ..... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

State of Haryana & others ..... RESPONDENT(S) . . .

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH . . .

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? . . .

PRESENT: - Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Kirti Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

. . .

Surya Kant, J (Oral) 1.

The Deputy Commissioner, Karnal has filed the affidavit dated 5.8.2015 explaining that the impugned order dated 6.4.2015 appointing the Naib Tehsildar, Gharaunda as Duty Magistrate for restoration of the possession of disputed land has already been cancelled and shall not be executed. In Para 6 of the affidavit, it is further averred that explanation of AVIN KUMAR 2015.09.24 12:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh

CWP No.12065 of 2015 [2] BDPO, Gharaunda was obtained. As per the said explanation, "neither the present disputed land belong to the Panchayat nor there was any eviction order passed for the eviction of the petitioner".

2.

Since the impugned action initiated against the petitioner stands cancelled, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. (Surya Kant) Judge (Jaspal Singh) September 08, 2015 Judge avin AVIN KUMAR 2015.09.24 12:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh