Raj Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Another

JYOTI 2025.07.10 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-25796-2025 -2between them appears to be genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence.

Learned State Counsel as well as counsel for respondent No. 2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR No.0205 dated 25.07.2022.

Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench Judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, the present petitions are allowed and FIR No.0205 dated 25.07.2022, under Sections 323, 452 and 506 of IPC, registered at Police Station Gurgaon City, District Gurugram, and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 23.04.2025 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioner. 10.07.2025 (SUKHVINDER KAUR) jyoti3 JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No JYOTI 2025.07.10 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document