Harparkash Saxena v. State Of Haryana And Another

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-31419-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision:-22.8.2022 Harparkash Saxena ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Munfaid Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Krishan K. Chahal, Addl.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Tejas Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Ojas Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.192, dated 10.8.2021, Police Station Sector-17, District Faridabad, under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code on the ground that he is not named in the FIR and that the complainant has already compromised the matter with co-accused Rahul Singh.

2.

Learned counsel representing respondent No.2 has, however, denied the factum of compromise.

3.

This Court finds that the matter is still at the stage of investigation. Even though the petitioner is not named in the FIR, the investigating agency may PANKAJ KAKKAR 2022.08.23 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

( 2 ) CRM-M-31419-2022 (O&M) be able to collect some concrete evidence against the petitioiner during the course of investigation. As such, this Court does not find any justification so as to invoke inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for the purpose of quashing of FIR. The petition, as such, is sans merit and is hereby dismissed. 22.8.2022 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2022.08.23 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document