High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/112/2016disposed of

Rajni v. Punjab National Bank & ANR

2016-01-07Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain1 pages

KAPIL 2016.01.08 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CWP No.112 of 2016 Date of Decision: 07.01.2016.

Rajni

...Petitioner

Versus

Punjab National Bank and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. N.S. Dandiwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** SABINA, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the family pension to unmarried daughter.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner had moved representation (Annexure P-4) before respondent No.2 for redressal of his grievance but no action has been taken on the same so far.

Accordingly, without adverting to the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to dispose of the representation (Annexure P-4) expeditiously, in accordance with law by passing a speaking order, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. January 07, 2016 (SABINA) kapil JUDGE