Sushil Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others



   

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No. 15074 of 2020 Date of Decision: 22.09.2020 Sushil Kumar Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:

Mr. Manoj Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, DAG, Haryana.

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):

The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.

After arguing for some time and realising that there is an alternative remedy in Clause 8 (xiv) of the State Transport Haryana Employees Transfer Policy 2018, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail the remedies.

Learned counsel for the State appearing on advance notice submits that if such a representation is made, the same would be decided expeditiously.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.09.22 04:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Sector-1, Chandigarh



    In case the petitioner make representation within one week after complying with the conditions laid down under Clause 8 (xiv) of the aforesaid transfer policy, same be decided within six weeks, but no later than 30 th November, 2020.

[AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE nd September, 2020 mk

1. Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes / No

2. Whether reportable :

Yes / No PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.09.22 04:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Sector-1, Chandigarh