Sumeet Garg And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP No. 11287 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 11287 of 2016 Date of decision : 03.08.2017 Sumeet Garg & ors.

....Petitioners V/s State of Haryana & ors.

....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

Mr. HPS Ishar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Rohit Arya, Asst. A.G. Haryana.

Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for respondents no. 2 & 3. Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Advocate for respondents no. 5 & 6. Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate for respondent no. 7. RAJAN GUPTA J.

Challenge in the present petition is to decision of the District Bar Association, Yamuna Nagar regarding draw of lots for allotment of chambers in the District court, Jagadhari. During the course of hearing of the petition, learned counsel have submitted that they shall be satisfied, if matter is remitted to the District Judge, Yamuna Nagar to examine the matter and make an effort to resolve the same. This court finds this proposal reasonable.

Under the circumstances, matter is remitted to District Judge, Yamuna Nagar to examine the matter. Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as counsel for the District Bar Association undertake that they shall assist the District Judge to arrive at a just conclusion which is acceptable to all. They further assured the court that they will not adopt any agitational Ajay Kumar 2017.08.12 13:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CWP No. 11287 of 2016 means for resolving the issue. Writ petition is, thus disposed of with a direction to District Judge, Yamuna Nagar to try to resolve the same at the earliest. Needless to observe that proceedings of the Building Committee shall be taken into consideration while arrive at a decision. August 03, 2017 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No Ajay Kumar 2017.08.12 13:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document