Sheetal Prasad v. Ombir And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No. 2145 of 2008 Date of Decision : 02.02.2016 Sheetal Prasad ....Appellant
Versus
Ombir and others
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present:
Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Rohit Goswami, Advocate for Mr. Vinod Chaudhri, Advocate for respondent no. 4-Insurance Company.
Surinder Gupta, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he could not file the correct address of respondent no. 1 as the appellant despite intimation has not turned up. Cost of `1000/- imposed vide order dated 05.11.2015 was also not deposited. In view of submissions of learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of order dated 05.11.2015, reserving the right of appellant to get it restored as and when the aforesaid order is complied with. February 02, 2016 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE JITENDER KUMAR 2016.02.03 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document