Naim Ahamed v. Sate Of U.T. Chandigarh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29575-2020 Decided on : 20.08.2021 Naim Ahamed . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of U.T. Chandigarh . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL (Through Video Conferencing) PRESENT: None for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Y.S. Rathore, Addl. PP, UT Chandigarh with Ms. Sudha Singh, Advocate and Mr. Yuvraj Singh Rathore, Advocate.

**** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (Oral) This is the second filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 87, dated 13.02.2018, under Sections 376(1), 506 of IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act (Section 6 of the POCO Act, added later on), registered at Police Station Mani Majra, Chandigarh. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Learned APP, UT Chandigarh, at the outset, on instructions from SI Balkar Singh, has submitted that prosecution evidence stands concluded and the prosecutrix has supported the case of the prosecution in its entirety. He further submits that the trial is going to conclude very shortly. In view of the fact that the trial is nearing completion, this Court is not inclined to extend the concession of regular bail to the petitioner. Petition stands dismissed accordingly.

(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE August 20, 2021 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2021.08.20 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document