Vipin Chauhan v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRR-2137-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.12.2018 Vipin Chauhan ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: None.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) On the first call, when the case was called, the petitioner has gone un-represented. Therefore, the case was pass-over. On second call, some proxy counsel had appeared on behalf of the petitioner and prays for adjournment which was refused, on the ground that instant petition is not maintainable, inasmuch, as even acceptance of the same shall bring no fruitful result to the petitioner, on account of not challenging the order of summoning. Therefore, proxy counsel for the petitioner requested for pass-over.

After lunch on the third call, again the petitioner has gone un-represented.

Therefore, the instant revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.

December 03, 2018 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2018.12.05 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document