(O&M) Pratap Singh Beeka v. Raj Rani

FAO-M-233-M-20 05 (O&M) IN THE E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB B AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-MDate of d -233-M-2005 (O&M) decision: September 19, 2024 Pratap Singh Be eeka ....Appellant t versus Raj Rani ....Respondent t CORAM: HO HO Present:- Mr Mr ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDH ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJI HIR SINGH IT SINGH BEDI r. Kunal Singh, Advocate for r. Keshav Pratap Singh, Advocat te for the appellant.

***** GH, J. (ORAL) SUDHIR SING At the outset, learned counsel for t the appellant submits that during g pendency of the e appeal, the appellant has expir red, and this appeal has become e infructuous.

2.

Di sposed of, accordingly.

3.

Pe nding application(s), if any, shal ll stand disposed of.

September 19, mahavir Whether speaking Whether reportabl (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE g/reasoned:

Yes/No le:

Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2024.09.20 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment