Sandeep Kumar Sdo v. State Of Haryana And ORS
C.W.P No. 11518 of 2016 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 11518 of 2016 Date of decision : 02.06.2016 Sandeep Kumar Sud ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:
Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
**** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) The precise grievance of the petitioner is that despite the fact that he has been acquitted, vide judgment dated 25.11.2014 in a criminal case vide F.I.R No. 146 dated 04.06.2008 u/s 406/409/420/120B IPC, his suspension period has not been treated as duty period and has not been granted 1st ACP after 05 years of service. Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied, if directions are issued to respondents to decide the representations (P-4 to P-6).
In view of above, without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to GAURAV ARORA 2016.07.08 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
C.W.P No. 11518 of 2016 -2decide the representations (P-4 to P-6) of the petitioner, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with Rules/law. (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE 02.06.2016 G Arora GAURAV ARORA 2016.07.08 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document