Bharat Bhushan v. State Of Punjab And ORS
!"!
#$%&%'&%( )* )+")# &&&
# * , *"+"
+#./#0
) *"
&&&
"1 #0 # "
!
"""
!
#
%& %' (%(# )* +(,
(
!
) .,
#
.
5 6
7
- .5 &8%8 (%(#
" #
%
$& '"() #
*
!
:
.5+&8%8+(%(#
!
#& %( (%(# * 2# %2 (%(# '
2# %2 (%(#
!
!
- &
;
-
<
-
-
!
! ## $
=>
#(
!
!
!
#2
-
$
1 -
?
#9
@
=A! $
+ ,, $ -.-/0 $& $+
$&
#
%
5 ,
#
* (8 ## (%(4 - =A! $
(% (#
+ "20. In the instant case, it is evident that while respondent No. 1 was recommended for promotion before his retirement, he could not assume the duties of the Chief Scientific Officer. Rule 54(1)(a) of the West Bengal Service Rules, clearly stipulates that an employee must assume the responsibilities of a higher post to draw the corresponding pay, thus, preventing posthumous or retrospective promotions in the absence of an enabling provision.
21. While we recognize respondent No.1's right to be considered for promotion, which is a fundamental right under Articles 14 and 16(1) of the Constitution of India, he does not hold an absolute right to the promotion itself. The legal precedents discussed above establish that promotion only becomes effective upon the assumption of duties on the promotional post and not on the date of occurrence of the vacancy or the date of recommendation. Considering that respondent No. 1 superannuated before his promotion was effectuated, he is not entitled to retrospective financial benefits associated to the promotional post of Chief Scientific Officer, as he did not serve in that capacity."
#'
:
-
+
!
#8
#&
#<
(%
1*!2%3%( -4 -- kanchan
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No