Ram Dass Sharma v. State Of Punjab Etc

CWP No.11631 OF 2016 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11631 OF 2016 DECIDED ON: FEBRUARY 26, 2018 RAM DASS SHARMA .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

Present:

Mr. Ramesh Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. TPS Chawla, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.3 and 4.

***** JASPAL SINGH, J (Oral) The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing impugned order dated 08.07.2015 (Annexure P-8) vide which recovery of Rs.61,890/- has been ordered to be effected on account of excess payment of leave encashment. AND further directing the respondents to refund the same along with interest @ 12% per annum and to grant interest on delayed payment of gratuity.

2.

At the very outset of the arguments, it has been pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that amount which was deducted by the respondents in pursuance of order dated 08.07.2015 (Annexure P-8) has been Sonika 2018.02.27 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.11631 OF 2016 --2-- refunded with interest. As such, he does not want to proceed with the instant petition and intends to withdraw the same.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

FEBRUARY 26, 2018 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Sonika 2018.02.27 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh