Sukhmani Singh v. State Of Punjab
!"
"
"
"
"# $"%
&'()&
!
%
&'( ") (*(+
-./ +0 1+ *2 (*(2
+1'3&4 ++' ++03+4 +&*
")
!!
##
5 36 714 (
-./ 7 "Today, an application PDG No.357352/356727 dated 29.05.2024 from Taranjit Singh of son of H.No.306, Tibba Road, at Sh. Suhail
street No.02, Ludhiana station Police the through post case. for the Singh, Gopal been has after the registration resident Nagar, received inquiry, of the The contents of which are as under: From: The Director, Bureau of Investigation, Punjab, Chandigarh. To: Ludhiana. No.1800/CC51, Commissioner Police, dated, Chandigarh the: 22.05.2024 Subject: Complaint against Sukhmani Singh Ohri son resident of of Jagjeet Singh Gopal Nagar, Tibba Road, Ludhiana. Memo. Please refer to the subject cited above. 2. Complaint submitted Sh. Taranjit Singh resident of by Gopal Nagar, Tibba Road, Ludhiana is sent herewith, please send the status of matter to of this office earliest. Encls:5 Complaint. Incharge/Complaint Copy Cell, For/Director, ΒΟΙ, Punjab, Chandigarh. In respect of this subject, the application is as under:5 To, The D.G.P., Punjab.
Application son of against Sukhmani Singh Ohri Jagjeet Singh, resident of H.No. 13282, street No.5, Gopal Nagar, Tibba Road for the registration for the usurping lacs of of the case rupees by inducing innocent persons in his net, portraying himself as an Advocate, by by preparing bogus degrees alongwith his friend David, and for preparing his bogus certificates and by portraying himself to be an Advocate reputation by stating and getting false himself to be an advocate despite not having any degree of LL.B. Sir, (1) That I am a peace loving and law abiding citizen. (2) That the above accused Sukhmani Singh alias Ohri has been portraying himself as an Advocate, whereas Sukhmani has never done any LL.B. The above accused on the basis certificates, of bogus has earlier got enrolled.
When the accused came to know last year about the scandal of bogus advocates, then the accused got himself enrolled by getting bogus certificates of Uttar Pradesh, but the said accused has not LL.B. of any University. enquired about this and evidence in this the same to you degree any I of have fully have cogent I regard. I will produce at time the of Alongwith Sukhmani alias Mani, need. many accused persons are doing the business of bogus degrees, which is being run main head David Gill, advocate. a case registered against was alias Mani, in Vigilance Police by (3) the That Sukhmani station, Ludhiana, in which he remained in the jail.
* the said case, the accused by stating himself to be an advocate in the court, had got the bail. Of which also, I have cogent evidence. Thus, you that said 468, a case I request be registered against the accused under sections 420, 465, 467, 471 and other sections portraying himself to of IPC, for be an advocate and using the bogus certificates and degree and preparing bogus certificates giving to the persons, and the persons as stating himself as an and cheating the court an advocate and by advocate and cheating the persons and he may be sent behind the bars at the earliest. Thanking you," + +,-),-.+, , /)0'12 +2 -0) 3)-.-.+,)&
, 6
# 3
4 , "
# # -./
(8&9(*(( #
" ##!
: # ,
!
-
# ,
"
;
:, %#
% "
! #
/
, ,
##
36 72 6 7 =4
-./
!
!
3$ 4
-./
#
,
#
#
#
, #,
, /)0'12 +2 -0)
-'-)45+631'.,',- > %
!
9 "
"
!
5
#
!
#
! #
/ #
(( *0 (*(& :> !! 5
,
,
#
% : # !#
%
,
1*91(9(*12
!
"
5
# %
"
%
,'1(7.7
?
# , #
/ , ,
36 72 6 7 =4
1*91(9(*12
#
#
! !
## , # !
!
!
#
,
, # prima facie ##
#
!
, !
!
, ,
,
!
, )1.)2 :
!
!
. >
% ,
9, !
#
&'(3(4
")
! 7 'When the High Court or the Court of Session makes a direction under sub5 section (1), it may include such conditions in such directions in the light of the facts of the particular case, as it may think fit, including5 (i) a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii) a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the
case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(iii) a condition that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court;
(iv) such other condition as may be imposed under sub5section (3) of section 480, as if the bail were granted under that section.' :
#
,
%
, # , . #
"%
Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No