Raj Rani v. Union Of India & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

CWP No.15955 of 2013 Date of Decision : 18.2.2015 Raj Rani ......Petitioner Vs.

Union of India and others ......Respondents ...

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK ...

Present :

Mr.PKS Phoolka, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. ADS Bal, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Bal, Sr.Advocate, for respondents no.1 to 3.

Ms. Neha Jain, Advocate for respondent no.4.

...

1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

2. Whether the judgement should be reported in Digest ? RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J Learned proxy counsel for respondents no.1 to 3 submits that since the pension of the petitioner has been revised, present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of, as such. Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner also fairly states that let the present writ petition be disposed of in view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondents no.1 to 3. Disposed of, accordingly.

18.2.2015 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) GS JUDGE GREESH SAHNI 2015.02.19 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh