Sarala Devi v. Union Territory Chandigarh And Others

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH *** CWP-13978-2026 Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 SARALA DEVI

...Petitioner

Versus

UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Sankalp Dhanda, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Avinit Avasthi, Additional Standing Counsel with Mr. Himmat Singh Sidhu, Junior Standing Counsel For respondent No.1 Mr. Avinit Avasthi, Advocate also representing respondent Nos. 2 to 5 - PGIMER *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to the respondents to permit Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP).

2.

Learned counsel for respondents-PGIMER submits that petitioner was subjected to multiple tests including genetic test. In the test reports, it has been found that there is no fetus abnormality warranting MTP. 3.

Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition.

SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.05.27 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-24.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of.

5.

Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 27.05.2026 SDK Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.05.27 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document