Ajit Kaur v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

-1CWP No.16071 of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.16071 of 2013 Date of decision: 19.10.2015 Ajit Kaur ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - None for the petitioner.

Mr. Suresh Singla, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ***** PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL) On 13.10.2015 petitioner was directed to be present in Court. However, despite second call neither petitioner nor her counsel put in appearance nor costs of `5,000/-, imposed vide order dated 10.12.2013, have been deposited.

Dismissed for non-prosecution with costs of `10,000/- in addition to the costs of `5,000/- already imposed. The total costs of `15,000/- shall be deposited with the State Legal Services Authority, Punjab within a period of two months. If costs are not deposited, same shall be recovered as arrears of land revenue. RAVINDER SINGH 2015.10.21 14:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

-2CWP No.16071 of 2013 In view of dismissal of the writ petition, CMs filed by respondent No.4 are disposed of as infructuous. However, respondent No.4 will be at liberty to avail remedy in accordance with law. (Paramjeet Singh) October 19, 2015 Judge R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2015.10.21 14:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document