Shanti Saroop v. Priti And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRR (F) No.656 of 2022 Date of decision : 13.11.2024 Shanti Saroop .............Petitioner

Versus

Priti and another .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: None --- SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) None has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Same was the position on 13.7.2023. Vide order dated 3.8.2022, notice of motion was issued subject to the petitioner depositing a sum of ₹33,000/- as litigation expenses with the registry of this Court. Office note indicates that notice could not be issued for want of process fee. It is, thus, indubitable that the amount of ₹33,000/-, as directed for vide order dated 3.8.2022, has not been deposited. Ergo, dismissed for non-prosecution.

Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to seek for recall of this order on showing sufficient cause.

(SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 13.11.2024 Ashwani Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No Ashwani Kumar 2024.11.13 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document