Jaydeep v. State Of Punjab
CRM-M-26032-2025 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26032-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.02.2026 Jaydeep ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present :
Mr. Manoj K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner
***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1.
Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0271 dated 14.09.2024, registered under Sections 115(2), 103(1), 109, 191(3) and 190 BNS at Police Station Sohana, District SAS Nagar, Mohali.
2.
Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody for 1 year and more than 5 months. He was not named in the FIR, however, it is only on the supplementary statement of the complainant made after 3 days, his name surfaced and as per the allegations, he has given beatings with sticks and swords to him. The injury to the deceased is stated to have been caused by coaccused Ravi Malik. Only the wooden stick has been recovered from the petitioner. Charges have been framed on 14.11.2025, however, out of 25 prosecution witnesses, none has been examined. The petitioner is not involved in any other case.
3.
The custody certificate dated 25.02.2026, filed by the learned State
CRM-M-26032-2025 (O&M) 2 counsel is taken on record. As per the same, the petitioner is behind bars for 1 year, 5 months and 2 days.
4.
Learned State counsel and learned counsel for the complainant oppose the bail on the ground that there are specific allegations levelled by the complainant against the petitioner of having given injuries and the stick stands recovered from the drain. However, learned State counsel is unable to controvert the submissions with regard to stage and the petitioner being not involved in any other case.
5.
Heard.
6.
!
"!
# $ !% ! % & "'""$($# &
!
) ! )
&
$"
*
& 7.
The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, if not required in any other case and shall abide by the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
(ii) The petitioner will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witnesses.
(iii) The petitioner will appear before the trial Court on each and every date fixed, unless is exempted by a specific order of Court.
(iv) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to
CRM-M-26032-2025 (O&M) 3 the offence of which, he is an accused, or for commission of which he is suspected of.
(v) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly coerce, induce, threaten or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner.
(vi) The petitioner shall not in any manner misuse his liberty.
(vii) The petitioner shall furnish his address and mobile number by way of an affidavit to the trial Court and not change the same till conclusion of trial and if for any reasons, he seeks to change either of the aforesaid, it shall be done only with prior information to the learned trial Court.
(viii) The petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the trial Court.
(ix) The trial Court/Duty Magistrate may impose any other condition, as deemed appropriate while releasing the petitioner.
8.
It is made abundantly clear that in case there is any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the State shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail as granted to the petitioner by this order.
9.
In view of the above, it is clarified that the observations made herein above are limited for the purpose of present proceedings and would not be construed as any opinion on the merits of the case and the trial would proceed independently of the aforesaid observations. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 26.02.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes / No Whether reportable :
Yes / No