Kayum Khan v. State Of Haryana And ANR
1-
!"#$%&'
(&)*
! +!( !", %&'
(&)*
" -. /0 //
!
"!
# $$$ / )" %
&
&
'()*#+, , !
- .
#/ /0 #/#' , !
1.
2. . 34 5(#
/6 /0 #/#'
.
(#( ('0/74 ,*
(#0(#7 !
+ !
2.
" & #" .!& ! # 8
!
34 " .
!!
/6 /0 #/#'
!
% 9!."
- ! :
"
2- ". " !
&
! "
." ! !
;
- !! !!!
.
!
" . !
.
34
. "
.
#
!
. : & !& 1.
2 . "
" !!"
#/ /0 #/#' %
:
!
" # !
$ # %
! #
#
## " # &
' ()* # !
# !
# + ) !
# ## ,- ./
## !
0 !#
# #
" # % 1 ./
## #" #"!
0 !
! " %
!2 !#
" #
3- ./
## #
) !
3# ./ *
$
"
$
3# 4 #!-))) "
#
# " # '$4* #'
'
!# 5# 6 ( %
..
. '
. &!
!
"
. 1.
.
(#0(#74 ,&
#!."
:
-&!""
; 9
! ..
9
"
&
#
;
&
: & !&
" -
&!
, %
.
. &
&
&
& !.
& "
" 5 ! <
!
#&
&-
&!
(#( (#0 (#74 ,
. !
"
!!.
9
4 &
.
!
4-
& !.
#&
.
&
.
!!"
!&
# 4 &
!
!. .
!!!
. #
9&
&
< 1.
"
!! %
. & !
&
!
!!& # . !!"
4
.
!
&!
& =
! &
&
&!
,
"
!! &!
!
.
. & ! ,
!
!
!
."
!
!
.9
!
!
!
.
!!
& !
!!
> .
" !
&
- .
.& ! .
! !&!
% ?&!
;,
!) &
!!
& !
! !
"
! !&!.
&
! &
"!& !.
!
5- !!"
! 4 !"
!!
!!
& ! !
.
& ! 4 "#$
%& '( ?&!
, &
.
" !
!!
& ! .
"
"
9
9
&
.
4
" !
,
&
!!
&
&
9
!!
& ! 4 " &
& !
.
! &
!!
! "
"
!.
! !!"
& 9 .
& ! !
)
!& !
)* +"+ $,-,-&, (' "
;, !!"
.&
:
")
#
##
#
# ! ! # !
)
# #
#
# !
0
#
!
# #
%
# $
'
# ## #6
610.
4 9. )). ,-,, /
( ! the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that bail can always be revoked if the relevant material on record, gravity of the offence or its societal impact, have not been considered by the Lower Court. Where bail is granted in a mechanical manner, the order granting bail is liable to be set aside. Similar proposition of law had been laid down in Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2018) 3 SCC 22 and Central Bureau of Investigation, Hyderabad v. Subramani Gopalakrishnan, (2011) 5 SCC 296.
11.
The proposition of law as laid down in the above discussed cases is that the discretion to cancel bail is to be exercised by the Court only if the order qua grant of bail smacks of arbitrariness, capriciousness or perversity or on being satisfied on the basis of record that the accused has actually misused such liberty. In the instant case, the respondent No.2 has been booked for commission of offences punishable under Sections 323, 325 and 326 of IPC, which are triable by Magistrate. The respondent No.2 had surrendered before the Court and was ordered to be released on 20.05.2024. It is not the case of the petitioner that he had misused any term and condition for grant of bail. After being released on bail, he is not shown to have committed any such act or conduct amounting to evasion or attempt to evade the due course of justice or abuse the concession of bail granted to him. 5# % !
! , . &
"
!
" &!
7- ."
;
#.
!!"
& ! .
" !
>
!!
& ! !!
!
!!
%
. -
.
!!
& !
!
"
&
. . !! &
!!
!
!!
.
# ,
!!"
.! 5(
&
!
1/ 2 , %&'
(&)* *
'
& 0 2 , 728 &
# , 728