← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/27074/2019allowed

Kewal Singh And ANR v. State Of Punjab

2019-12-18Mr. Justice Surinder Gupta2 pages

CRM-M-27074-2019 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

(1) Crl. Misc. No.M-27074 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 18, 2019 Kewal Singh and another ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

(2) Crl. Misc. No.M-29060 of 2019 (O&M) Balwinder Singh ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-29060-2019 and for Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for petitioners in CRM-M-27074-2019.

Mr. Avtar Singh Sandhu, Addl. A.G. Punjab.

Mr. Kushagra Mahajan, Advocate for Mr. A.K. Garg, Advocate for the complainant.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Both the aforementioned petitions have been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.72 dated 04.06.2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Dina Nagar, District Gurdaspur. SACHIN MEHTA 2019.12.18 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M-27074-2019 -2Heard.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Pal Singh submits that petitioners have joined the investigation, which is still in progress but their custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of further investigation.

In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, both these petitions are allowed. Order dated 18.09.2019, passed in both the petitions, is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against them so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court;

(iv) that the petitioners will seek regular bail on presentation of challan in Court.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) December 18, 2019 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No SACHIN MEHTA 2019.12.18 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh