Dharampal And ORS v. Asstt. Collector 2nd Grade, Palwal And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 19497 of 2012 Date of Decision: 16.8.2016 Dharampal and others .....Petitioners Vs.

Assistance Collector 2nd Grade, Palwal and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present :

Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. R.K. Doon, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Ashwani Verma, Advocate for respondent No. 5 to 22.

**** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, fairly states that he had been placing reliance on the pendency of RSA No. 1080 of 2010 (Dharam Pal and others Vs. Birpal and others). He further submits that the abovesaid RSA No. 1080 of 2010 has been dismissed by this Court vide order dated 11.5.2016 and the partition has become final, besides exchange of possessions between the parties.

Amit Kumar 2016.08.17 18:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Civil Writ Petition No. 19497 of 2012 In view of the above undisputed fact situation obtaining in the present case, impugned orders Annexures P-1 to P-4 have not been found suffering from any patent illegality or perversity. All the four revenue authorities have recorded their concurrent findings of facts which deserve to be maintained.

In view of what has been observed hereinabove and coupled with the fact that RSA No. 1080 of 2010, which was the basis of the present case has already been dismissed, this writ petition has been found misconceived, bereft of merit and without any substance, thus, it must fail. No case for interference has been made out.

Resultantly, with the abovesaid observations made, instant writ petition stands dismissed, however, with no order as to costs. (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE 16.8.2016 Ak Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No Amit Kumar 2016.08.17 18:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document