Rakesh v. Babita

Crl. Revn. No. F-78 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revn. No. F-78 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision:- 18.05.2017 Rakesh

...Petitioner

versus Babita

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Harsh Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner.

RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) CRM-6154-2017 For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 15 days in filing of the present revision is condoned. The application stands disposed of.

CRR-F-78-2017 Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 11.11.2016 passed by the learned District Judge, Family Court, Gurgaon whereby the learned Court below has allowed the petition under Section 127 Cr.P.C filed by the respondent-wife for enhancement of maintenance and the respondent-wife was awarded maintenance of Rs.5000/- per month from the date of filing of the petition i.e 27.02.2015. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

A bare perusal of the impugned order shows that the respondent-wife was awarded maintenance of Rs.5000/- per month, as the petitioner has filed a reply in a petition under Section 24 of HMA and claims to be earning Rs.10,000/- per month. The learned Court below has awarded the maintenance to the respondent-wife keeping in view the price GAURAV ARORA 2017.05.19 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Crl. Revn. No. F-78 of 2017 -2index, while is rising considerably.

The prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner for sending the case to Mediation Centre of this Court is declined, as the impugned order has been passed after appreciating the evidence on record. Dismissed.

May 18, 2017 ( RITU BAHRI ) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2017.05.19 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh