Gianeshwar Sood v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33068-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.09.2022 GIANESHWAR SOOD

...Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present:

Mr. GS Brar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. IPS Sabharwal, DAG Punjab.

Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for accused, namely, Parveen Kumar.

**** HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.(Oral) Challenge is to the order dated 21.05.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, vide which cancellation report presented by the prosecution agency in FIR No.36 dated 20.02.2021, registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC, at Police Station Sadar, District Ludhiana, has been accepted. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition, with a liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the learned Sessions Court, challenging the acceptance of the cancellation report. He further submits that since the petitioner, under a bona fide impression, has approached this Court instead of Sessions Court, the delay which occurred because of the said reason, may be condoned.

AMAN JAIN 2022.09.12 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-33068-2022 (O&M) -2Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. The learned Sessions Court is directed to consider the condonation of delay application, if any moved by the petitioner, sympathetically.

12.09.2022 (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) Aman Jain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2022.09.12 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment