Azad @ Khardu v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP No. 1071 of 2017 Date of Decision: 26.10.2017 Azad @ Khardu

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Anil Kumar Malik, Advocate for Mr. Anoop Singh Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Amrik Narwal, DAG, Haryana.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Reply filed by learned State counsel is taken on record. Learned State counsel submits that two weeks parole has already been allowed to the petitioner, as such, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous.

In view of submission of learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition. Dismissed as withdrawn.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) October 26, 2017 JUDGE jk Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.10.26 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH