Kashmir Kaur v. State
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No.1142 of 2017 Date of decision: 20.09.2018 Kashmir Kaur ..Petitioner
Versus
State ..Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:
Ms. Divya Sharma, Advocate as Amicus Curiae for the petitioner.
Ms. Rashmi Attri, AAG, Punjab.
*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel on instructions from SI Rajinder Singh submits that both Harpreet Kaur and Raj Kaur were contacted but they are not in a position to come to the Court.
Raj Kaur has specifically stated that she is happy with the arrangement of the child.
Keeping in view the statement made by Harpreet Kaur and Raj Kaur, no further action is required to be taken. Disposed of accordingly.
20.09.2018 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2018.09.21 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh