Sunil Chahal v. Haryana Staff Selection Commission

CWP No. 16713 of 2021 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 16713 of 2021 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.8.2021 ...

Sunil Chahal ................Petitioner vs.

Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula through its Secretary .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. G.S. Gopera, Advocate for the petitioner.

...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Case taken up through video conferencing.

By way of filing the present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner - Sunil Chahal, craves for issuance of direction to respondent - Haryana Staff Selection commission, Panchkula, to award additional 5 marks for socio-economic criteria, after considering the declaration/ undertaking/affidavit alongwith application form/registration form dated 22.7.2019 Annexure P-6 and issue appointment letter to him for the post of Clerk (EWS category).

According to the petitioner, he had submitted a written representation to the respondent dated 9.8.2021 copy Annexure P-13, BANITA CHUGH 2021.08.27 13:16 I agree to specified portions of this document

CWP No. 16713 of 2021 -2but that had not evoked any response, as such he has filed the present writ petition.

Notice of motion.

At this stage, Mr. Tapan Kumar, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondent to consider and dispose of his representation, within a fixed time frame. Learned State counsel appearing for the respondent states that any such order passed by this Court shall be duly complied with. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to look into the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-13) and to take necessary action in the matter, in accordance with law, if it is so warranted by the facts and circumstances of the case. A speaking order in that regard be passed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

In case the petitioner still feels dissatisfied after disposal of the representation by the respondent, then he may take recourse to the legal remedy again, in accordance with law.

( H.S. Madaan ) 27.8.2021 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No BANITA CHUGH 2021.08.27 13:16 I agree to specified portions of this document