← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/13374/2015disposed of

Sandeep Kumar Gupta v. Central Information Commission And ORS.

2025-09-23Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13374-2015 Date of Decision : September 23, 2025 SANDEEP KUMAR GUPTA -PETITIONER V/S CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

Present:

Mr. Sardavinder Goyal, Advocate (Through V.C.) and Mr. Nishant Sindhu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Naveen Chopra, Advocate (Through V.C.) for the respondents No.2 and 3.

*** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1.

In deference to the hereinafter extracted order passed by this Court on 01.09.2025, today learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3, through his clerk, has supplied the list of selected candidates for the posts of Senior Scientist and Principal Scientist during the period 01.01.2006 to 31.12.2014. A copy of the list (supra) is also taken on record as 'Mark A'.

"Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he limits his prayer only to the extent that the list of persons selected for the post of Senior Scientists and Principal Scientists, for the period 01.01.2006 uptill the year 2014, be supplied to him. Learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3, seeks an adjournment to have apt instructions, in this regard, from the quarter concerned.

The asked for request is accepted.

List this matter on 23.09.2025, for arguments. DEVINDER YADAV 2025.09.24 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-13374-2015 In case, the request of the petitioner is accepted, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3, shall supply the list of persons selected (supra), to the petitioner, on the next date of hearing, and a copy whereof, be also placed on the record. To be shown in the urgent list.

It is made clear that on the next date of hearing, no request for an adjournment on behalf of either of the parties concerned, shall be entertained."

2.

In view of the compliance made by learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant writ petition, as his grievance stands redressed. Therefore, the instant writ petition is closed.

3.

Disposed of accordingly.

(KULDEEP TIWARI) September 23, 2025 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2025.09.24 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment