Raj Kumar Alias Raju v. State Of Punjab And Others

In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-34889-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 17.3.2022 Raj Kumar @ Raju ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Bharat Puri, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral) CRM-36527-2021 In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed as prayed for and Annexure P-5 and P-6 are taken on record subject to all exceptions.

Main case Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and without commenting anything as regards the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Rural, Jalandhar (respondent No.3) to ensure that the matter pertaining to FIR No. MOHAN SINGH 2022.03.17 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

- 2 - CRM-M-34889-2021 (O&M) 85, dated 16.6.2021, Police Station Adampur, Jalandhar, under Sections 186, 353, 420, 120-B IPC (Sections 307 IPC and Section 20, 61(A), 68 of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 added later on), is got investigated in accordance with law and the contentions, as raised in representation dated 24.7.2021 (Annexure P-4) are also considered.

A copy of this order along with copy of representation Annexure P-4 be sent to respondent No.3-Senior Superintendent of Police, Rural, Jalandhar, for necessary compliance.

17.3.2022 (GURVINDER SINGH GILL) mohan JUDGE Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No MOHAN SINGH 2022.03.17 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document