Mukesh Devi v. State Of Haryana And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12598 of 2016 DATE OF DECISION :- June 23, 2016 Mukesh Devi
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU Present:- Mr. J.S. Cooner, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. *** M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Counsel appearing for the official respondents submits that the subject tender floated did not fructify as there was no response to the tender floated.
In view of the above development in this case, the Writ Petition in our view has become infructuous. Therefore, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU) JUDGE June 23, 2016 p.singh PARVINDER SINGH 2016.06.24 11:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh