Jai Parkash v. Authorised Officer Vijaya Bank And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CM No.11729-CWP of 2016 in CWP No. 12639 of 2016 Decided on : 08.03.2017 Jai Parkash . . . Petitioner

Versus

Authorized Officer, Vijaya Bank and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Narinder S. Lucky, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner.

None for the non-applicant/respondents.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) CM No.11729-CWP of 2016 This is an application filed under Order 9 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking restoration of the writ petition, which was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 14th September, 2016. Notice of this application was issued to the nonapplicant/respondents No.1 & 2. After hearing learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner and perusing the averments made in the application, which is supported by an affidavit of the learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner, the same is allowed and the writ petition is ordered to be restored to its original number. CM stands disposed of.

CWP No. 12639 of 2016 At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the main case is taken up for hearing today.

Jawala Ram 2017.03.15 12:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CM No.11729-CWP of 2016 in - 2 - CWP No. 12639 of 2016 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned authority for redressal of the grievance. 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to him, in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAMENDRA JAIN) March 08, 2017 JUDGE J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jawala Ram 2017.03.15 12:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh