Pardeep Kumar v. State Of Punjab And Another
! "
#$%!& !$' !$ (")
*+
!
"# !
"
# $% &&
'
()* +,-
,,. ,+/ # $,/ $.%0 )&
"
1
"" 2
""
'
!
2
"
#
"
"
!
"
"
& 34
"
+ &" 2
+%,$ , $
!
& 5
6
2
"
" 3
"
5
"
" )
!
,-+, , $
& 5
6 & "
" !
&
8
REEMA SAINI 2024.10.16 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh & 5
"
Sikandar Masih
Alias Shera and Another vs State of Punjab and Another decided on 9.2.2023 it was held that "Likewise, those cases where the charge is framed but the evidence is yet to start or the evidence is still at infancy stage, the High Court can show benevolence in exercising its powers favourably, but after prima facie assessment of the circumstances/material mentioned above. On the other hand, where the prosecution evidence is almost complete or after the conclusion of the evidence the matter is at the stage of argument, normally the High Court should refrain from exercising its power under Section 482 of the Code, as in such cases the trial court would be in a position to decide the case finally on merits and to come a conclusion as to whether the offence under Section 307 IPC is committed or not."
Heard.
9
,.,$ , $ 5 "
5
"
:
!
"
"
)
5
"
5
"
"
()* +,-
,,. ,+/
+%,$ , $
"
!
"
!
#
$
REEMA SAINI 2024.10.16 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh