Divya Gaur And ANR v. State Of Haryana And Others

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRWP No. 8152 of 2021 Date of Decision: 01.6.2022 Divya Gaur and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Ms. Aarti Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sumit Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

**** SURESHWAR THAKUR , J.

(ORAL) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus hence directing respondents No. 2 to 4 to give protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners, and also against any interference in the peaceful life of the petitioners being made at the behest of respondents No. 5 to 7. 2.

The learned State Counsel, does not have any objection, to an order being made by this Court to the respondents concerned, to look into and decide through a speaking order, representation Annexure P-7. Consequently, this Court directs the respondents concerned, to within three weeks hereafter, hence decide Annexure P-7, through a speaking order.

4.

For facilitating the decision, to be made, upon Annexure P-6, the petitioners are directed to, within a fortnight, make their personal appearances before co-respondent No. 3.

5.

Petition is disposed of.

(SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE June 01, 2022 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No GURPREET SINGH 2022.06.02 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh