Abhishek v. Pharmacy Counsel Of India And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.17012 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.1.2016 Abhishek ..... Petitioner

Versus

Pharmacy Council of India and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL

Present:

Mr. S.S. Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok K. Sharma, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Amrit Paul, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. Aseem Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr. Balkar Singh, Advocate for Mr. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Mr. Vishal Mittal, Advocate, for respondent No.5. RAJESH BINDAL, J Learned counsel for the parties fairly submitted that the claim made in the present petition is squarely covered by judgment of this Court in LPA No.800 of 2015-Khayati Moudgil v. Union of India and others, decided on 19.10.2015.

For the detailed reasons recorded in Khayati Moudgil's case (supra), the present petition is disposed of in the same terms. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 19.1.2016 sharmila SHARMILA 2016.01.25 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

Chandigarh