Shri K. Srinivasulu v. Union Of India And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH


 
CWP No.18871 of 2023 Date of Decision:28.08.2023 Shri K, Srinivasulu ....Petitioner vs.

Union of India and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. H.S.Dhindsa, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate and Mr. Ashutash Dhankar, Advocates for respondents No. 3 and 4 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking quashing of order dated 11.03.2015 (Annexure P-6) whereby claim of the petitioner has been rejected. 2.

On being confronted with the fact that petitioner has already filed an appeal against the impugned order, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer to direct the appellate authority to decided his appeal in a time bound manner.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate, who is present in Court accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 3 and 4, and submits that appellate authority would decide appeal of the petitioner within six weeks from today. PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.08.28 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP No.18871 of 2023 -2- 2023:PHHC:112161 5.

In the wake of statement of learned counsel for respondents No. 3 and 4, the present petition stands disposed of. 6.

On adjudication of appeal, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail remedy as permissible by law.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 28.08.2023 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: Yes/No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.08.28 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment